Ethical Issues Involved in Animal Testing Essay

Ethical Issues Involved in savage Testing - Essay Example3). Another argument that contests wolf exam is the deterrent example status animals. It was noted that animals capacity to feel entertainment or pain equate them to humans in terms of moral status. The arguments on the moral status of animals were discussed extensively in Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. One argument was contended by Kant in his Lectures on Ethics, highlighed as follows we have indirect duties to animals, duties that are not toward them, just now in regard to them inso farthermost as our treatment of them can affect our duties to persons (Kant, 1997, p. 240). Animal Testing is Ethical It has been revealed that the argument for or against animal testing actually stemmed from the views of philosophers (Mukerjee, 1997). As disclosed, Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher and a writer of Animal Liberation, allegedly supported the utilitarian theory which espoused that in all decisions the total sum of money of good that resultshuman and animalshould be weighed against the sufferinghuman and animalcaused in the process. Not that to him the interests of humans and animals have equal weight life is of far greater value to a human than, for example, to a creature with no self-awareness (Mukerjee, 1997, p. 87). Apparently, the philosophy of utilitarianism was identified with John Stuart Mill, who espoused that in any given situation the recompense action would be the action that tended to minimize the suffering and pain, and maximize the pleasure and happiness, of all interested parties. He further thought that the suffering, pain, pleasure and happiness of animals should be included in this calculus (Branham, 2005,... It has been revealed that the argument for or against animal testing actually stemmed from the views of philosophers (Mukerjee, 1997). As disclosed, Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher and a writer of Animal Liberation, allegedly supported the utilitarian theory which espoused that in all decisions the total amount of good that resultshuman and animalshould be weighed against the sufferinghuman and animalcaused in the process. Not that to him the interests of humans and animals have equal weight life is of far greater value to a human than, for example, to a creature with no self-awareness (Mukerjee, 1997, p. 87). Apparently, the philosophy of utilitarianism was identified with John Stuart Mill, who espoused that in any given situation the right action would be the action that tended to minimize the suffering and pain, and maximize the pleasure and happiness, of all interested parties. He further thought that the suffering, pain, pleasure and happiness of animals should be included in this calculus (Branham, 2005, par. 2).To refute Regans assertions that animals have rights, philosophers and researchers, such(prenominal) as Carl Cohen. The Moral Significance of Animals Moral Claims, 2010, par. 12). This assertion was likewise supported by Festing and Wilkinson that the use of animals in research can be ethically and morally justified. The benefits of animal research have been enormous and it would have severe consequences for public health and medical research if it were abandoned (Festing & Wilkinson, 2007, p. 1).